[wxPython-users] Best practice to rganize the code

[Peter Damoc]

Hi Tim,

actually wxpita is still in its infancy, needs to grow a little bit, to
mature.

I put the link here because I looked at the code and it looks beautiful. If
someone wants to make something similar it can use it as a source of
inspiration.

Peter

On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Tim van der Leeuw <tnleeuw at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Peter Damoc <pdamoc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Actually there is a library that does something like this:
> >
> > http://code.google.com/p/wxpita/
> >
> > When dealing with code complexity I try to think about 2 things:
> > 1. How can I turn this into an API
> > 2. How can I turn this into Ravioli
> >
> > I fail miserably most of the time... but when I succeed is rather nice.
> >
> > Peter.
> >
>
> The sample on the front-page looks really sweet. Since wxpita is a wrapper
> around wxPython, how well does wxpita code mix with plain direct wxPython
> code?
>
> Can I gradually add / introduce this in a program, or should I start my
> program afresh using this?
>
> I'm not sure I'll actually use much of it because I use wxGlade to
> generate code for GUI classes. However, sometimes I need to manually take
> care of some components or event-bindings.
> It might make life quite a lot easier if I take the Pythonic approach of
> wxpita for those components, rather than try to convert the full program
> when anyways nearly all of that code is generated for me...
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> --Tim
>
>
>


-- =

There is NO FATE, we are the creators.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wxwidgets.org/pipermail/wxpython-users/attachments/200803=
17/d3614fe9/attachment.htm