[wxPython-dev] 20071113 test build uploaded
Robin Dunn
robin at alldunn.com
Thu Nov 15 10:28:07 PST 2007
Alexei Vinidiktov wrote:
> Peter Damoc wrote:
>> Actually, there are reasons to keep them separated BUT only for the
>> library (to facilitate easy security/bugfixes updates on sane systems
>> like Linux).
>>
>> But, IMHO, The Demo should always come bundled with the latest and
>> greatest wxpython distribution. Almost nobody updates The Demo without
>> updating the library.
>>
>
> I think you're right. There should be two separate packages: one for the
> wxPython library, and the other for the wxPython library together with
> the Demo. That's what I actually wanted to suggest, not merging them.
Ok guys, thanks for the feedback. I'll take a look at shifting things
around to have a "full" or "developers" package and also a
"runtime-only" package. This actually might go along well with some
ideas I am kicking around for the OS X packages... It won't be done for
this release though.
--
Robin Dunn
Software Craftsman
http://wxPython.org Java give you jitters? Relax with wxPython!
More information about the wxpython-dev
mailing list