[wxPython-dev] 20071113 test build uploaded

Robin Dunn robin at alldunn.com
Thu Nov 15 10:28:07 PST 2007


Alexei Vinidiktov wrote:
> Peter Damoc wrote:
>> Actually, there are reasons to keep them separated BUT only for the 
>> library (to facilitate easy security/bugfixes updates on sane systems 
>> like Linux).
>>
>> But, IMHO, The Demo should always come bundled with the latest and 
>> greatest wxpython distribution. Almost nobody updates The Demo without 
>> updating the library.
>>
> 
> I think you're right. There should be two separate packages: one for the 
> wxPython library, and the other for the wxPython library together with 
> the Demo. That's what I actually wanted to suggest, not merging them. 

Ok guys, thanks for the feedback.  I'll take a look at shifting things 
around to have a "full" or "developers" package and also a 
"runtime-only" package.  This actually might go along well with some 
ideas I am kicking around for the OS X packages...  It won't be done for 
this release though.

-- 
Robin Dunn
Software Craftsman
http://wxPython.org  Java give you jitters?  Relax with wxPython!





More information about the wxpython-dev mailing list