[wxPython-dev] SoC Unit Test Status

[Robin Dunn]

Frank Tobia wrote:
> Robin,
> 
> On 7/11/07, *Robin Dunn* <robin at alldunn.com <mailto:robin at alldunn.com>> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
>      >
>      > As for the virtual size failures, I suspect the issue is that
>      > SetVirtualSize doesn't allow the virtual size to go below the
>     control's
>      > current size? Is that correct?
> 
>     It is limited based on what the virtual size hints are currently set
>     to.
>       Here is the common (platform independent) base class version:
> 
> 
> I'm still curious about this, and having problems.  SetVirtualSize 
> doesn't look like it's using those hints as minima (on Windows).
> For example:
> a.SetVirtualSizeHints(1,1)
> a.SetVirtualSize((2,2))
> a.GetVirtualSize() # does not return 'wx.Size(2,2)'
> 
> Am I missing something?  Should setting the VirtualSizeHints give me 
> control over what range of VirtualSize is possible?

The current client size is factored in.

wxSize wxWindowBase::DoGetVirtualSize() const
{
     // we should use the entire client area so if it is greater than our
     // virtual size, expand it to fit (otherwise if the window is big 
enough we
     // wouldn't be using parts of it)
     wxSize size = GetClientSize();
     if ( m_virtualSize.x > size.x )
         size.x = m_virtualSize.x;

     if ( m_virtualSize.y >= size.y )
         size.y = m_virtualSize.y;

     return size;
}


> 
> Also, there's no corresponding "GetVirtualSizeHints", which may be 
> useful for tests like these.

Enter a bug report about this.

-- 
Robin Dunn
Software Craftsman
http://wxPython.org  Java give you jitters?  Relax with wxPython!