[wxPython-dev] Re: 20061118 test build uploaded

jmf jfauth at bluewin.ch
Tue Nov 21 13:33:12 PST 2006


Robin Dunn wrote:
 > All *.pth files are loaded, and probably in no particular order.  So
 > having both wx*.pth files will cause both paths to be added to the
 > sys.path.  You might want to consider just having one file and edit it
 > when you want to change the default.  I think you can have # comments in
 > the file so you could have both paths listed in there, and just comment
 > out the one you don't want to be active.

Correct, and this is what I do. I have a wx.pth symlink in my home
directory, with entries for 2.6.3.3 and 2.7.2. One is commented. I have
a script that I can run at the commandline such as:

wx stable
wx dev

Works well.

----

I noticed it is not even necessary to use a commented line. More
precisely, the first valid line wins.
The wx.pth file may end or not with a "\n".

wx-2.8-msw-unicode
wx-2.7.2-msw-ansi

=> wx-2.8 is used

wx-2.7.2-msw-ansi
wx-2.8-msw-unicode

=> wx-2.7.2 is used

#wx-2.8-msw-unicode
wx-2.7.2-msw-ansi

=> wx-2.7.2 is used.

#wx-2.7.2-msw-ansi
wx-2.8-msw-unicode

=> wx-2.8 is used.

Anyway, as Paul McNett has said, it is working very well.

jmf




More information about the wxpython-dev mailing list