wxWidgets is dead, rest in peace :-)

[Jorgen Bodde]

The comparison page was even worse and totally unfair in the past. He
pasted a fully commented wxWidgets sample (e.g. 50% comments to
explain to the newbies) and a clean fully optimized non commented U++
example next to it. Sorry, but that's no comparison. I'm glad he
realised that and now the differences aren't that big anymore.

By the way I like the wxWidgets version better because it is more
transparent. I don't like it that a lot of things are done under the
hood without me (as developer) not having control over them.

- Jorgen

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Vadim Zeitlin <vadim at wxwidgets.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 08:07:59 -0700 (PDT) todma <toddmarshall2002 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>  t> On Apr 10, 9:21 am, "Timothy Warren" <t... at timshomepage.net> wrote:
>  t> > I think the wxWidgets one looks more native.
>  t>
>  t> Is that good or bad?
>
>   I don't know what was meant by this in this particular case but in general
>  it would be good because it means we've succeeded with our goal. Which is
>  to provide a way to portably use the native platform UI (unlike Qt or Java
>  AWT).
>
>   Regards,
>  VZ
>
>  --
>  TT-Solutions: wxWidgets consultancy and technical support
>                http://www.tt-solutions.com/
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  wx-users mailing list
>  wx-users at lists.wxwidgets.org
>  http://lists.wxwidgets.org/mailman/listinfo/wx-users
>