Free visual debugger for bcc

[Milan Babuskov]

Iulian-Nicu Serbanoiu wrote:
> The only good thing that I can see from using the borlands compiler is that
> is has great speed when it comes to compilation, but this thing can be
> achieved with gcc versions > 3.4

AFAIK, GCC 3.4 is not available on Windows. And even then, GCC on Linux 
is 4-5 times slower than Borland or Microsoft.

> or microsoft's c/c++ compiler ( cl.exe ) -
> it's about precompiled headers.

Yes. Microsoft's compiler seems to be the best option on Windows.

-- 
Milan Babuskov
http://www.guacosoft.com
http://javagames.sourceforge.net