bug with wxVariant

Sebastien Senechal seb at cyberdine.ca
Sun Oct 22 18:23:44 PDT 2006


yeurk, my mistake. I meant:

wxLogVerbose( "there is " + wxString(nb) + " items containing " + 
wxString(nb2) + "other items")

will result in compiler complaing wxString(int) is private
Although i find this is inconvenient, i found my answer in wxWidget code:



  // if we hadn't made these operators private, it would be possible to
  // compile "wxString s; s = 17;" without any warnings as 17 is implicitly
  // converted to char in C and we do have operator=(char)
  //
  // NB: we don't need other versions (short/long and unsigned) as attempt
  //     to assign another numeric type to wxString will now result in
  //     ambiguity between operator=(char) and operator=(int)
  wxString& operator=(int);

  // these methods are not implemented - there is _no_ conversion from int to
  // string, you're doing something wrong if the compiler wants to call it!
  //
  // try `s << i' or `s.Printf("%d", i)' instead
  wxString(int);




More information about the wx-users mailing list