Associating data with wxListCtrl in virtual mode

[Lloyd]

Thanks vadim, It will take some time (for me) to understand what you
suggested :)

Thanks again

  Lloyd.


On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 11:09 +0100, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:34:17 +0530 Lloyd <lloyd at cdactvm.in> wrote:
> 
> L> I know wxLC_VIRTUAL is meant for when we have 1000s of rows! If I try to
> L> sort my huge vector each time, it will take considerable time! 
> L> 
> L> Can I solve this problem without sorting the vector?
> 
>  Only by maintaining a separate mapping between positions on the screen and
> indices in the vector. This wouldn't be much faster if your vector contains
> "small" objects (or pointers to large ones) though. It still can be a good
> idea if you use the indices into this vector from other parts of your
> program. In general I'd advise abstracting access to the data via methods
> such as GetItemAtPosition() which would make it clear whether you access
> the item by internal index or its position on screen and would allow you to
> change the implementation later.
> 
>  Regards,
> VZ
> 


______________________________________
Scanned and protected by Email scanner