[wx-discuss] wxWeb Port licensing and naming

[ABX]

Vadim Zeitlin <vadim at wxwindows.org>:
> IMO the ideal solution would be to start with a port using the native HTML
> widgets (i.e. basically the elements allowed in HTML forms if I understand
> correctly?) and add wxUniversal-like enhancement later for custom controls.

That's close to what I had in mind talking to Julian off the lists last days.
I see wxWeb development in following steps/phases:

1. make communication-less part of wxWidgets working on server and allow it to
return textual information into pure html page - something like console
application in other ports dedicated to preparing wxString, wxDateTime,
wxLongLong etc. etc to be usable.

2. make control-less application working - I mean minimal sample of course -
that means introduction of initial server-client communication together with
base wxTLW methods.

3. introduction of controls with focus on native html controls like radios,
buttons, comboboxes,  text editor, anchor tag as hyperlink control etc.
Perhaps with sizers realised through borderless tables.

4. introduction of wxDC, wxPen, wxBrush etc.

With last step all wxUniversal can be further developed on top of it but imo
steps 1-3 are most wanted.

ABX

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: wx-discuss-unsubscribe at lists.wxwidgets.org
For additional commands, e-mail: wx-discuss-help at lists.wxwidgets.org