[wx-discuss] Hoyle reviews wxWidgets

[Robin Dunn]

Ryan Norton wrote:
> JS> >  I won't be at all surprized that relatively higher
> JS> >popularity of wx among Python programmers compared to C++ ones is 
> entirely
> JS> >due to the demo existence. I'd love to have something like this for C++
> JS> >library but, of course it would be quite an effort to reproduce it 
> in C++.
> ZZOZOOOMMMMG when I saw the wxPython demo for the first time last week I 
> was FLOORED, it is no wonder wxPython has so many f8ns!!!   

Stop!  You guys are making my ego grow too big!  ;-)

>  
> The idea of the demo has me exited.... reproducing the in-place editing 
> of the wxPython demo is going to be difficult, but not too much IF WE 
> MAKE EACH DEMO PART A DLL!!!!

Right, but if the person running the demo is just evaluating the lib, 
they most likely don't have it installed yet, and so recompilation of 
the DLL when they edit the code is going to be very tricky.  I suppose 
we could set up a server that the demo sends the edited code to which 
then compiles a new DLL and sends it back.  (And then sit back and count 
how many security experts would have a coronary over that.)  ;-)

-- 
Robin Dunn
Software Craftsman
http://wxPython.org  Java give you jitters?  Relax with wxPython!


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: wx-discuss-unsubscribe at lists.wxwidgets.org
For additional commands, e-mail: wx-discuss-help at lists.wxwidgets.org