[wx-dev] Re: which versions of the manual do we want?
Bryan Petty
bryan at ibaku.net
Sun Mar 2 15:37:35 PST 2008
On 3/2/08, Francesco Montorsi <f18m_cpp217828 at yahoo.it> wrote:
> The first thing I've tried is to transform through an XSLT the doxygen
> XML output into XHTML; however that's going to be a lot of work! doxygen
> XML is _very_ much structured and writing an XSLT which produces
> something similar to the doxygen HTML output would take a lot of time.
I was guessing you were going to run into this problem, but I thought
you might have known something I didn't like having an existing XSLT
to work off of, but I haven't been able to find one myself.
I've been working on an updated Supybot plugin to read the Doxygen
XML, and provide reference in the wxWidgets IRC channel to replace the
existing, outdated wxOracle bot. Lucky for me though, it only needs to
provide minimal reference information, and I've been fairly successful
with it so far despite the complicated XML markup that Doxygen
provides.
Nothing I've done with this could be used for a stripped down CSS-less
version of the manual though. It strips out and ignores anything
complex like code examples and tables, and doesn't even touch any of
the main pages or overviews.
I do have a different idea that could pan out to a usable CSS-less
version of the manual. Maybe, given an appropriate LaTeX renderer, we
can get HTML-only docs from the LaTeX output given with Doxygen. It
will require that we add another external tool to the tool-chain, but
won't be just another TeX2RTF solution, heh. I'll take a look and see
if I can find something we can reasonably use on at least the 3 major
platforms. It would help if you could do the same in case one of us
finds something the other doesn't. I'm not too familiar with LaTeX
parsers, and what's out there.
Regards,
Bryan Petty
More information about the wx-dev
mailing list