[wx-dev] RFD: Debian packages for wx 3.0

Robin Dunn robin at alldunn.com
Fri Jun 13 16:07:46 PDT 2008


Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:41:41 -0700 Robin Dunn <robin at alldunn.com> wrote:
> 
> RD> There are some advantages to keeping them together
> 
>  I do realize this but I think they're compensated by disadvantages of
> having to understand both C++ and Python part whenever you modify the files
> even if you're interested in only one of them. I.e. I believe the savings
> in complexity will be significant enough to compensate for these
> advantages.

Very possible.


> RD> > 3. Development packages:
> RD> >  - libwx3.0-headers containing all headers (excluding setup.h)
> RD> >  - libwx3.0-dev containing wx-config, wxrc and setup.h
> RD> 
> RD> Is there any need/desire to have an additional dev package containing
> RD> the static libraries?
> 
>  I don't think so, what would they be for?


For people that want to link statically but use standard packages.  On 
further thought though I suppose that this would be needed only rarely 
and not worth the time or bandwidth to produce the package.


-- 
Robin Dunn
Software Craftsman
http://wxPython.org  Java give you jitters?  Relax with wxPython!



More information about the wx-dev mailing list