[wx-dev] Improving wxString proposal (Re: #9672: wx 2.9 Ansi/Unicode Combi-wxString)

[Jethro Grassie]

Thats understandable. But no need to make other changes surely?
The 2.9/3 change practically keep compatibility from what I can see (so from
a user perspective there is little to worry about).
I just cannot see the benefit of having wxUString , wxCString etc described
in this thread.



On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Marcin Wojdyr <wojdyr at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Jethro Grassie <jtgrassie at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I cannot see what is soo wrong with how strings are in 2.8 (and to be
> > honest, I havent looked into what the changes are in 2.9).
>
> This was written many times. Having two builds was bad, because I had
> to test if program compiles with both of them (in addition to testing
> 3 wx versions, 4 compilers, 3 platforms, a few different configure
> options in my application, ...).
>
> Marcin
>
> --
> Marcin Wojdyr | http://www.unipress.waw.pl/~wojdyr/<http://www.unipress.w=
aw.pl/%7Ewojdyr/>
> _______________________________________________
> wx-dev mailing list
> wx-dev at lists.wxwidgets.org
> http://lists.wxwidgets.org/mailman/listinfo/wx-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wxwidgets.org/pipermail/wx-dev/attachments/20080708/fd828=
dcc/attachment.htm