[wx-dev] Re: XTI class names

[Bill Baxter]

On 7/24/07, Stefan Csomor <csomor at advancedconcepts.ch> wrote:
> Hi Vadim
> > On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:18:32 +0200 Francesco Montorsi <f18m_cpp217828 at yahoo.it> wrote:
> >  I think wxObjectCreator is too generic but OTOH "Bridge" is a bit unusual
> > for me in this context, so I'd call it wxObjectCreateAdaptor ("Create()",
> > as in the method name, not "Creator").

What about 'Adapter' instead of 'Adaptor'?  Merriam Webster gives
Adapter as the main entry and Adaptor as a variant.  Or is it a
Brit/US thing?

--bb