[wx-dev] Re: What's the future of wxT() and _T()?

[Vadim Zeitlin]

On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 18:38:49 +0000 Julian Smart <julian at anthemion.co.uk> wrote:

JS> > 5. Remove wxT() and _T() completely (don't touch _T() if it's defined
JS> >    externally to wx)
...
JS> Nobody will bother to upgrade if it's that incompatible, IMO. These 
JS> macros should at least be present but empty.

 Yes, I agree. We just can't break *all* the existing code like that.
Besides there is no real advantage to doing this compared to the other
options...

 Anyhow, if both Julian and Robert are against changing wxT and _T I think
the only decision which can reach consensus is to not touch them. I will
add wxS (to 2.8 too) and start using it however if nobody objects.

 Regards,
VZ