[wx-dev] Re[2]: What's the future of wxT() and _T()?

[Vaclav Slavik]

Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
>  So maybe we could use wxSTR() or even wxS()?

These are meaningless, but then, so is wxSTRING_TEXT, so I wouldn't 
mind wxS (I like it better than wxSTR because it's shorter). And we 
didn't backport wxSTRING_TEXT to 2.8 yet, although I thought we 
already did, so it's still OK to change it.

Vaclav

-- 
PGP key: 0x465264C9, available from http://pgp.mit.edu/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.wxwidgets.org/pipermail/wx-dev/attachments/20071201/5a9692a7/attachment.pgp