[wx-dev] What's the future of wxT() and _T()?

[Vaclav Slavik]

Julian Smart wrote:
> I think I'd go for (0) - I don't like the idea of wxT() strings not
> being passable to wxChar* arguments;

Don't forget that we're *not* going to use wxChar* arguments anywhere 
in wx API. 

Vaclav

-- 
PGP key: 0x465264C9, available from http://pgp.mit.edu/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.wxwidgets.org/pipermail/wx-dev/attachments/20071201/5dc652a4/attachment.pgp