[wx-dev] wxMac: Universal Binary question

[Anders F Björklund]

Stefan Csomor wrote:

> you can also achieve this support situation 10.2-10.4 when building
> against the 10.4 SDK, at least on 2.6, for CVS HEAD I'm not supporting
> 10.2 anymore. But I think it is better to build against 10.4 SDK 
> because
> then I am using the available API on that target system and fall back
> gracefully when you run under 10.3. The only drawback is that you 
> indeed
> have different execution paths in wx when running on different systems.

And if you drop the Jaguar support and require Mac OS X 10.3.9 or later,
then you could also use GCC 4.0 for both PowerPC as well as Intel 
builds ?
Since you said that wxWidgets 2.8 will not support Mac OS X 10.2, I 
mean...
(i.e. then it can use the 10.4u SDK and the Tiger system g++-4.0 
compiler)

So for wxWidgets 2.8 you have:
MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED = MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_3
MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MAX_ALLOWED = MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_5

And for wxWidgets 2.6 you had:
MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED = MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_2
MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MAX_ALLOWED = MAC_OS_X_VERSION_10_4

Is that correct ? (or was it more like a "general recommendation" ?
documentation only says "compatibility is not guaranteed any more")

--anders